Abstract
A quality liquid soap must have essential characteristics, such as gentle application, pleasant color and aroma, adequate viscosity, good foam formation, effective cleaning, ideal pH and absence of irritation to the skin and mucous membranes, ensuring safety and satisfaction to the user. The evaluation of the quality of formulations available on the market represents an active surveillance approach, capable of identifying flaws in the formulation and production of these products. In this context, this study evaluated, through laboratory tests, the physical-chemical quality and functionality of liquid body soaps containing glycerin, sold in pharmacies. The methodology included the analysis of five brands of soaps, focusing on parameters such as labeling, pH, water content, foaming capacity, cleaning power and types of preservatives. The results revealed that some brands presented non-conformities in the labeling test, in addition to variations in the other parameters evaluated. These findings suggest that good manufacturing practices, as well as pre-formulation and stability studies, may be being neglected or performed inadequately, impacting the final quality of the products. It is concluded that there are flaws in the labeling of some brands of liquid soap, but the physical-chemical properties of the respective glycerin formulations sold in the state of Maranhão, with the exception of product [E], exhibit a behavior suggestive that they minimally fulfill their role as liquid soap.
References
1. München D. Sabonetes líquidos: aspectos tecnológicos e de mercado. Rev Bras Cosmetol. 2012;18(2):45-50.
2. Fiorentino FAM. História dos sabonetes: da antiguidade aos dias atuais. Cosmet Toiletries. 2009;31(4):22-28.
3. UNIOESTE. Produção de sabonetes líquidos: métodos sintéticos e naturais. Rev Quím Ind. 2009;15(3):12-18.
4. Bittencourt R, Silva L, Oliveira M. Ingredientes naturais em sabonetes líquidos: uma revisão. Rev Bras Farm. 1999;80(4):123-130.
5. Mendes C. Glicerina: aplicações e mercado na indústria cosmética. Cosmet Sci. 2012;34(1):56-62.
6. Brasil. Lei Federal Ordinária n° 6.360, de 23 de setembro de 1976. Diário Oficial da União; 1976.
7. Sanctis R. Produtos cosméticos: tendências e inovações. 2011.
8. Ribeiro M. Inovações em formulações cosméticas. 2010.
9. Steinberg D, et al. Estudos sobre a atividade antimicrobiana em formulações cosméticas. 2016.
10. ANVISA. RDC nº 04, de 30 de janeiro de 2014. 2014.
11. Wetter R, et al. Alergenicidade de conservantes em cosméticos. 2010.
12. Fernandes D. Limitações e aplicações dos parabenos em cosméticos. 2013.
13. Steinberg DC. Preservatives for Cosmetics. 2nd ed. Carol Stream: Allured Publishing Corp; 2006.
14. Thompson JC, He B. Characterization of crude glycerol from biodiesel production from multiple feedstocks. Appl Eng Agric. 2006;22(2):261-265.